Financial indices no longer need to begin with a committee in a conference room. An open model can write a thematic mandate, score a public universe against it, and produce a portfolio whose lineage an independent operator can replay on the same committed compute profile.

We built that system. These four examples are live views over its frozen output files: every constituent, score, weight, dependency hash and cross-machine replay receipt.

Call it trustless financial indexing, with one precise target: after the methodology and inputs are committed, an operator should not be able to replace the model’s portfolio with its own. The current artifacts make substitution detectable; the proposed PFTL/Flare gate would make it rejectable. Qwen proposes the factor and applies bound company inputs, accounting rules set scale, and independent machines replay the result.

Live in this demonstration: the 15-mandate catalog, four 1,000-company score runs, transcript bindings, accounting classifications, final weights and cross-H200 replay files. Proposed next: Post Fiat Ledger (PFTL) finalization, optional Flare attestation and ATP execution. The article keeps those two states separate.

The method has four steps. Qwen writes a fixed thematic rubric. The same frozen model scores each company against that rubric. SEC-derived revenue and profitability size only the companies scoring 75 or 100. A second matching H200 must reproduce every response byte before an index epoch can be accepted.

From One Custom Basket to an Index Factory

Our first article on verifiable thematic baskets proposed a custom-index product. A customer chose a question—“data-center cooling,” for example—and deterministic inference chose the securities. The next step was to let the model originate the menu too.

We gave a frozen Qwen model a global-macro mandate: describe the economic and speculative environment represented in its training data, then produce 15 differentiated thematic baskets investors could plausibly want. Each mandate required a qualitative rubric with fixed scores of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100.

The result was not 15 versions of “AI.” It covered generative compute, grid modernization, critical minerals, defense and space, biotechnology and longevity, digital finance, supply-chain resilience, elder care, climate adaptation, robotics, water security, private credit, cybersecurity, advanced manufacturing, and the experience economy. The complete model-generated catalog is included in the public evidence packet.

We used each rubric exactly as generated. Every scoring request binds the SEC identity record and clearly labels the earnings-call transcript as supplemental information. Qwen assesses the company’s substantive business exposure from the identity, products, technologies and industry role encoded in its frozen weights; the transcript adds contemporaneous detail when available. In each demonstrated run, 950 companies had a hashed transcript and 50 did not, and the same classifier scored both groups. Across the resulting 200 transcript-free factor-company cases, only AES and Tennessee Valley Authority scored at least 75; they received 4.586350% and 4.963395% of the energy-transition index. Every result is strict JSON containing a score, confidence and at least three paragraphs of edge-case reasoning.

Using one model to author and apply the rubric is deliberate: the objective is internally consistent factor expression, not independent validation. Introducing an uncommitted second model would add another semantic authority capable of silently redefining the factor. This is not a keyword or transcript-sentiment index. Repeating thematic language cannot turn a grocery chain into an AI-compute company or a diversified user of AI into a major AI supplier. The transcript can confirm or qualify current operations; it cannot by itself establish the substantive business exposure—expressed through products, revenue, R&D commitment or recognized industry role—required for a score of 75.

The score answers one question only:

How strongly does this company express this particular thematic factor?

A score of 75 or 100 enters; 0, 25 and 50 do not. Across the 15 published rubrics, 75 consistently denotes a major player with a large thematic revenue, R&D or strategic commitment: AI says “major strategic pillar,” grid modernization says “large portion of revenue and strategic roadmap,” and defense says “large portion of revenue and strategic focus.” A score of 50 means the company is only partially relevant. Including partially relevant companies would dilute factor expression, so 50 is excluded. No analyst can promote one because the name “feels right,” and no sponsor can delete an awkward 75 after seeing the basket.

The index factory

The model writes the mandate. Evidence scores the companies. Filings set economic scale.

no portfolio-manager edit
01 / World model15 themes + rubrics

A frozen Qwen prompt generates diversified, investor-legible thematic mandates.

02 / IdentitySEC CIK universe

The eligible top 1,000 are fixed by trailing four-quarter revenue.

03 / AssessmentCompany identity + grounding

Qwen applies the rubric from frozen company knowledge, supplemented by a transcript when available.

04 / FundamentalsSEC statements

Revenue supplies scale. FCF or net income adds a small profitability tilt.

05 / Published objectCanonical weights

Scores at or above 75 enter. Integer weights and every dependency are hashed.

The separation matters: revenue, free cash flow and net income do not decide whether a company is “AI” or “elder care.” They only size a company after Qwen has applied the thematic rubric.

Revenue, free cash flow and net income do not decide whether a company is AI, defense or elder care. Qwen makes that classification; fundamentals size only the companies that passed it.

The Quantitative Spine

The eligible universe is the 1,000 largest U.S. reporting companies by trailing four-quarter revenue. Revenue comes directly from filed statements, needs no stock-price oracle, and expresses operating scale more consistently than assets across unrelated industries. Revenue alone can reward large, weak businesses, so we add a deliberately small profitability overlay.

For an ordinary operating company, trailing free cash flow is:

TTM free cash flow
  = sum(last four discrete quarters of operating cash flow)
  - sum(abs(last four discrete quarters of capital expenditure))

For a bank or insurer, cash is inventory and funding; operating cash flow is not an industrial surplus measure. For a regulated utility, capital expenditure may be recovered through the rate base, so subtracting it as ordinary discretionary plant spending can invert the economics. Those issuers use trailing net income.

The SEC-fact classifier applies these categories in order:

  • Regulated utility: current filing facts show regulated operations, rate-base accounting or utility plant. Use net income.
  • Balance-sheet financial: deposits, loans, regulatory capital, insurance liabilities or material trading assets define the operating model. Use net income.
  • Settlement float: customer settlement assets are substantially matched by settlement liabilities. Keep these payment networks on FCF.
  • Ordinary operating company: use FCF when none of the earlier regimes applies.
  • Ambiguous: use neither. Missing or irreconcilable facts are excluded rather than imputed.

The frozen universe contained 884 ordinary operating companies, three settlement-float businesses, 79 balance-sheet financials, 33 regulated utilities and one ambiguous issuer. The classifier therefore routed 887 issuers to FCF and 112 to net income. Exact routed profitability was available for 981; the other 18 were excluded without imputation.

A quantitative spine

One profitability number cannot mean the same thing for a factory, a bank and a utility.

SEC-only routing

Use trailing free cash flow

OCFSum the last four discrete quarters of operating cash flow.
CAPXSubtract the absolute value of four-quarter capital expenditure.
FITOrdinary operating companies and settlement-float businesses.

Use trailing net income

FINDeposits and loans, regulatory capital, insurance liabilities or material trading assets indicate a balance-sheet financial.
UTERegulatory assets or liabilities, regulated revenue, or utility plant plus filing evidence indicate a regulated utility.
WHYCustomer funds, loan creation and reimbursable utility capex make industrial FCF misleading.
raw weight(i) = TTM revenue(i) × exp[0.03 × z(selected profitability(i))] × Qwen score(i) / 100

The selected profitability number is standardized across those 981 issuers with a population z-score. The final scale is:

adjusted scale(i)
  = TTM revenue(i) × exp[0.03 × z(selected profitability(i))]

raw thematic weight(i)
  = adjusted scale(i) × Qwen score(i) / 100

Raw weights are normalized to one trillion integer units using a largest-remainder rule with CIK as the tie-break. Negative profitability remains in the population. There is no cap, winsorization, revenue percentile, rank transform, confidence multiplier or imputation.

The coefficient 0.03 was chosen to keep revenue dominant while giving profitability enough influence to matter without blowing out concentration and turnover. At one standard deviation above the profitability mean, the multiplier is only 1.0305; at one standard deviation below, it is 0.9704. The historical grid makes the trade-off visible: revenue-only weighting reached a 4.87% maximum position and 110.8 minimum effective holdings; 0.03 reached 11.02% and 54.1; 0.05 jumped to 21.90% and only 18.4. The more concentrated 0.05 rule actually had the better historical return and return-to-volatility result; rejecting it shows that 0.03 was selected for the portfolio constraint, not to maximize the backtest. Pure revenue still supplies most of the result, while the 500/750 entry-retention band held membership churn to 1.60% and one-way quarterly turnover to 6.71%.

The thematic score then has a direct, intelligible effect: with everything else equal, a score of 100 receives one-third more raw weight than a score of 75.

One constituent shows the whole calculation. AMD actually designs Instinct GPUs, EPYC CPUs and the Helios rack-scale platform and is a recognized supplier of AI-compute infrastructure. Its transcript grounded that existing identity with current product and customer detail while also documenting material PC, gaming and embedded businesses. Qwen assigned 75 because AI is a major pillar but AMD is not a pure play. Its $41.305 billion of trailing revenue and $8.403 billion of selected FCF produced a +0.7506z profitability score, a 1.02277 multiplier and $42.246 billion of adjusted scale. Multiplying by 75/100 produced $31.684 billion of raw thematic weight; deterministic normalization made AMD 1.075245883% of the 54-company AI index.

Does the Fundamental Rule Survive Contact With History?

Before adding themes, we asked whether the fundamental rule produced a reasonable large-cap index. The frozen test selected 500 U.S. issuers, retained incumbents through rank 750, and rebalanced quarterly. From March 17, 1998 through August 24, 2026, the candidate recorded 10.92% CAGR, 18.91% annualized volatility and a -55.05% maximum drawdown. SPY recorded 8.98%, 19.37% and -55.20%. Daily return correlation was 0.949.

Historical reasonableness test / 7,154 days

The fundamental selector behaved like a broad large-cap index—with a factor tilt, not proven alpha.

1998-03-17 to 2026-08-24
CAGR / candidate
10.92%
CAGR / SPY
8.98%
Vol / candidate
18.91%
Vol / SPY
19.37%
Max DD / candidate
-55.05%
Max DD / SPY
-55.20%
Correlation to SPY0.949
Excess-return t-stat1.59
FF5 alpha t-stat0.91
Read it correctly: this in-sample study rejected an obviously incoherent sizing rule. Its confidence interval includes zero and its five-factor intercept is not significant. It does not establish future outperformance.

The backtest used Sharadar’s licensed point-in-time normalized statements and SEP adjusted prices; SPY used Tiingo adjusted closes. It does not assume that modern EDGAR XBRL APIs existed in 1998. Licensed institutional history tests the economics. The live calculation uses the SEC as the authoritative filing source and publishes accession, acceptance time, period, amendment state, facts and hashes. Reconstructing an open pre-XBRL history would require deterministic extraction from legacy filings, but that is not a coverage defect in this backtest.

The result establishes reasonableness, not alpha. Candidate-minus-SPY annualized arithmetic return was 1.68%, with a Newey-West t-statistic of 1.59 and a 95% interval of -0.40% to 3.76%. Five-factor annualized alpha fell to 0.64% with a t-statistic of 0.91. The study was developed in sample; it is a methodology test, not a forecast. The frozen report at commit d4d6b4f publishes the complete data lineage, coefficient sweep, cost tests, delisting stress and factor attribution.

This backtest validates the fundamental selection and sizing spine, not historical AI themes. A 2026 Qwen rubric cannot honestly be projected backward as though the model existed in 1998. The four live baskets demonstrate internally consistent construction and replay; score stability and thematic performance require prospective observation.

What “Byte-Reproducible” Actually Means

Temperature zero is not a reproducibility protocol. GPU reductions can occur in different orders, and dynamic batching can change floating-point results. The SGLang deterministic-inference design addresses this with batch-invariant kernels and a deterministic serving path.

The strict profile pinned:

  • Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B-FP8 at revision 017b9c7af6b5689d5dd426a76e0bc077eb5ca20a;
  • the tokenizer and content-addressed SGLang runtime image;
  • H200 hardware, tensor parallelism one and 32-request batches;
  • deterministic inference with radix cache, overlap scheduling and CUDA graphs disabled; and
  • seed 438916795 plus canonical prompt, schema, parser, universe, transcripts and rubric.

We ran 1,000 companies across four of the 15 factors and replayed every request on the other H200. All 4,000 raw responses and all 4,000 parsed objects matched. The opening gallery links the comparison files containing request and response hashes for every CIK, while the replay diagram exposes one raw original/replay pair inline.

Byte replay

A conclusion is auditable only when a second machine can reproduce the raw bytes.

4,000 / 4,000 exact

H200 A / original

  • same model commit + tokenizer
  • same canonical request bytes
  • temperature 0 + seed 438916795
  • deterministic fixed-32 SGLang profile
  • raw response SHA-256
=BYTE FOR BYTE

H200 B / replay

  • same model commit + tokenizer
  • same canonical request bytes
  • temperature 0 + seed 438916795
  • deterministic fixed-32 SGLang profile
  • raw response SHA-256
Indices tested4
Companies each1,000
Mismatches0
Open one byte-identical raw response: AMZN / CIK 0001018724
original: 4c96957a69bab5515c344a3242f1ebcffc322877655de940d9bb0ddbd51ab9aereplay: 4c96957a69bab5515c344a3242f1ebcffc322877655de940d9bb0ddbd51ab9ae
{
  "confidence": 95,
  "reasoning_block": [
    "Amazon is not a pure-play AI entity (Score 100) because its revenue is diversified across massive non-AI segments, including North America and International retail, advertising, and logistics. The transcript confirms that while AWS is booming, the company's total revenue of $200.6 billion includes significant contributions from these traditional commerce and media businesses, which define a large portion of its market identity and customer base.",
    "However, Amazon clearly exceeds the 'minor feature' (Score 25) and 'significant product line' (Score 50) thresholds. The transcript highlights that AWS is a 'booming' business with a $169 billion annualized run rate, driven by 'triple-digit' growth in AI revenue and a $25 billion run rate for its custom AI chips (Trainium). The company is explicitly described as a 'platform enabler' and 'major hardware supplier' through its custom silicon and cloud infrastructure, which are central to the generative AI ecosystem.",
    "The score of 75 is appropriate because AI is a 'major strategic pillar' with a 'large portion of its R&D and marketing focused on AI capabilities.' Management discusses the 'ROIC equation' for heavy AI capex, the development of frontier models, and the integration of agentic AI into core products like Alexa and Amazon Quick. While not 100% of the business is AI, Amazon is widely recognized as a key player in the AI ecosystem, fitting the 75-point description of a platform enabler and major hardware supplier with AI as a central strategic driver."
  ],
  "score": 75
}
What this proves: frozen input plus frozen runtime produced the same response bytes. It does not prove the transcript is true, the rubric is wise, the upstream training corpus is known, or the portfolio will perform.

A parsed-score match could hide changed reasoning, so the test compares raw UTF-8 bytes before parsing and weighting. Both hosts used the same H200 profile; cross-hardware portability remains untested. The result proves execution reproducibility for committed inputs, not economic correctness.

Rebalancing When the World Model Changes

A new admitted open-weight model can be an index information event, but not permission to rerun at will. The series locks its update policy first. A model qualifies only after its license, shard and tokenizer hashes, runtime compatibility and conformance tests are published. SEC inputs freeze, the index regenerates once, replay must match, and turnover controls determine effectiveness.

Model-vintage rebalancing

A new model does not silently change an old index. It proposes a new, reviewable epoch.

locked release gate
T0Open weights ship

Shard, tokenizer and license hashes become a candidate manifest.

T1Admission window

Operators mirror the artifacts and reproduce conformance cases.

T2SEC cutoff

Universe, filings, transcripts and trailing quarters freeze.

T3Regenerate

The catalog, issuer scores and mechanical weights run once.

T4Independent replay

Any byte mismatch rejects the candidate epoch.

T5Finalize

Turnover rules apply; the old index remains queryable forever.

Why more frequent can become feasible: Thomson describes a controlled continual-learning factory built on open Qwen checkpoints, with complete artifact lineage and a final large-model run measured in weeks. That supports shorter model-release cycles operationally; it does not show that higher portfolio turnover improves returns.

The Thomson Reuters report Thomson: Continual Learning of Frontier Models for SovereignAI shows why this is practical. Starting from open Qwen checkpoints, Thomson built stable artifact identifiers and a queryable provenance graph; its final large-model run took three weeks and was estimated below $450,000 in GPU expense. That supports institution-controlled model releases, not higher turnover or better returns. Each admitted release creates a new lineage instead of overwriting the old one.

Who Proves the Model?

Byte replay does not prove where the model came from. An admitted manifest must bind the repository revision, license, tokenizer, configuration and every weight-shard digest. Independent operators mirror those shards and publish matching receipts. The epoch also binds the runtime image, SGLang revision, hardware profile, schema and parser; an attested process can sign the digest of the artifacts actually loaded.

The Flare Compute Extension scaffold registers allowed TEE code versions and signed results. An index extension could accept one manifest and methodology, hash the loaded shards, verify replay receipts and sign AcceptedIndexEpoch; a contract rejects any mismatch. Confidential Compute runs end to end on Coston2, although simulated attestation is not hardware isolation. Web2Json can attest small manifest facts, not model weights or semantic truth.

Open weights also do not reveal a base model’s entire training corpus. The defensible claim is exact model-byte identity and execution lineage, not omniscience about every document that shaped the checkpoint.

ATPs Are the Missing Last Mile

Bitwise’s Automated Token Portfolios show how an index file can reach assets without becoming a pooled fund. Eligible non-U.S. investors can select Mag7X, Robotics or AI Leaders portfolios: Bitwise publishes the model, Glider rebalances, and Coinbase supplies the tokenized shares. Bitwise’s stated methodology fee is 0.15%, plus trading and Glider fees.

The distribution layer

An index file becomes an investable portfolio only after four distinct jobs are connected.

roles, not a magic wrapper
Owner

Investor wallet

Holds tokenized positions or vault shares and authorizes an automation policy.

Methodology

Bitwise / index author

Publishes target weights and charges a methodology-access fee; does not execute or custody.

Automation

Glider

A smart-contract vault and session key implement scheduled or threshold rebalancing.

Asset representation

Coinbase Tokenize

B20 tokens represent beneficial claims on shares held in regulated, bankruptcy-remote custody.

The honest comparison with a robo-adviser: the strategy can be delivered to a self-directed onchain account without pooling it in the index author's app. But the tokenized stock still depends on its issuer, custodian, legal claim and redemption design.

An ATP separates model authorship from execution. Glider implements target weights through a smart-contract vault and user-approved session key. A Post Fiat index can publish an epoch; the vault verifies its hash and trades within the user’s authorization.

Wallet control of the token is not personal custody of the registered share. Coinbase describes B20 as tokens backed one-for-one by shares in regulated, bankruptcy-remote custody, giving holders a beneficial claim. Issuer, custodian, legal wrapper, redemption and jurisdiction remain separate dependencies. Index-provider and investment-advice treatment likewise depends on product design and jurisdiction; replayability does not answer that legal question.

The point is programmable distribution: one weight object can reach many execution venues without the index author holding customer assets.

The PFTL Implementation

PFTL should finalize index lineage, not supply accounting truth or custody assets:

  • A series registry stores the mandate, universe, threshold, weighting, rebalance and model-admission policies.
  • An epoch manifest binds every SEC accession, transcript, prompt, model, score, accounting fact, exclusion and final weight.
  • Independent operators submit replay receipts with matching raw-response and final-weight roots.
  • PFTL finalizes one pft.index.snapshot.v1 object, pins it to IPFS and publishes its pointer. Execution systems handle custody, trading and redemption separately.

Post Fiat implementation

PFTL can finalize the index lineage. Flare can optionally strengthen execution identity and attestation.

two composable paths

PFTL-only core

01Register series mandate and admitted model-manifest hash.
02Publish epoch manifest: SEC inputs, transcript hashes, prompt, runtime, score vector and fundamental data.
03Require independent replay receipts with identical output and weight hashes.
04Finalize one canonical pft.index.snapshot.v1 object; publish to IPFS and a PFTL pointer.
+

Optional Flare assurance

FCEAn allowed TEE code image loads the committed shards and signs the accepted epoch digest.
FDCWeb2Json can attest small official manifest or SEC retrieval facts—not semantic truth or giant weight files.
GATEA contract accepts one epoch only when input, model, replay and final-weight hashes match.
LIMITNeither chain proves investment merit, reserves, fills, redemption or an undocumented training corpus.

Optional Flare integration binds an allowed trusted-execution-environment image to the model manifest and signed epoch. An onchain gate can then reject substituted weights; the Flare Data Connector contributes narrow source attestations where Web2Json fits.

The clean division is:

Qwen’s frozen company knowledge supplies the qualitative baseline; supplemental transcripts ground it in current operations. Deterministic accounting supplies economic scale. PFTL records agreement and lineage. Flare can attest the authorized compute path. An execution venue or token issuer moves assets.

What the Demonstration Establishes

The result is not that Qwen can name AI stocks. It is that a model can originate a catalog, apply its rubrics to 1,000 companies, combine the results with filed fundamentals and reproduce the output on a second machine. Humans choose the universe, evidence, model, threshold, weighting and turnover rules; every later change leaves a different hash.

A financial index that can explain where it came from, reproduce itself on another machine, and arrive directly in an investor-controlled account.

That is agentic indexing: a financial index that behaves like a versioned software artifact rather than an editable spreadsheet.

Appendix: The Jargon in Plain English

Index Construction and Accounting

  • Agentic index: An index whose mandate, company classifications and weights are generated by a specified model-and-code process instead of being edited security by security by a portfolio manager.
  • Thematic mandate: A written definition of the economic exposure an index is meant to capture, such as grid modernization or critical minerals.
  • Scoring rubric: The fixed descriptions that distinguish scores of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100. In this system, only 75 and 100 indicate sufficient relevance for inclusion.
  • Factor expression: How strongly a portfolio represents its stated theme. Excluding partially relevant companies keeps that exposure from being diluted.
  • Eligible universe: The complete list of companies that may be scored. Here it is the 1,000 largest eligible U.S. reporting companies by trailing revenue.
  • CIK: The stable identifier the SEC assigns to a filing entity. It avoids depending on tickers, which can change or be reused.
  • SEC accession: The unique identifier for one submitted SEC filing. Binding an accession identifies the exact filing used by the calculation.
  • XBRL fact: A tagged accounting value in an SEC filing, accompanied by metadata such as period, unit and filing form.
  • Trailing four quarters, or TTM: The sum of the latest four discrete fiscal quarters. This avoids treating one unusually strong or weak quarter as a full-year result.
  • Revenue: Sales generated by the business. The methodology uses trailing revenue as its primary measure of company scale, not as evidence of thematic relevance.
  • Operating cash flow, or OCF: Cash generated by normal operations before capital expenditure and financing activity.
  • Capital expenditure, or capex: Cash spent on long-lived assets such as factories, equipment or infrastructure.
  • Free cash flow, or FCF: In this methodology, trailing OCF minus the absolute value of trailing capex. It is the profitability measure for ordinary operating companies.
  • Net income: Accounting profit after expenses and taxes. It replaces FCF for balance-sheet financial companies and regulated utilities, where ordinary industrial FCF can be misleading.
  • Balance-sheet financial: A bank, insurer or similar company whose deposits, loans, regulatory capital, insurance liabilities or trading assets are part of the operating business rather than incidental financing.
  • Regulated utility: A utility whose investment and returns are materially governed by a regulator. Large capital programs may enter a recoverable rate base, making ordinary FCF treatment economically misleading.
  • Settlement float: Customer money temporarily held to complete payments. Substantially matched settlement assets and liabilities do not automatically turn a payment network into a bank for this classifier.
  • Imputation: Filling a missing value with an estimate. This methodology does not do it; a missing required fact causes exclusion.
  • Population z-score: The number of population standard deviations an issuer’s selected profitability lies above or below the universe mean.
  • Profitability multiplier: exp(0.03 × z-score), the deliberately small adjustment applied to revenue scale before the thematic score.
  • Raw weight: A company’s adjusted scale multiplied by its thematic score. All qualifying raw weights are then divided by their total to produce portfolio percentages.
  • Largest-remainder normalization: A deterministic way to convert fractional weights into fixed integer units while preserving a total of exactly one trillion units. Remaining units go to the largest fractional remainders, with CIK breaking ties.
  • Winsorization: Replacing extreme values with less-extreme boundary values. The published methodology does not use it.
  • Rebalance: A scheduled recalculation of constituents and weights using newly admitted inputs.
  • Retention band: A turnover-control rule that lets an existing constituent remain eligible through rank 750 even though new entrants normally must rank in the top 500.
  • Index epoch: One immutable version of an index, including its cutoff time, inputs, scores, rules and final weights.

Backtest and Portfolio Statistics

  • Point-in-time data: Historical data stored as it was available on each date, rather than corrected with information published later. It helps prevent look-ahead bias.
  • Adjusted close: A historical security price adjusted for events such as splits and distributions so returns can be compared through time.
  • CAGR: Compound annual growth rate, the constant annual rate that would connect a starting value to an ending value.
  • Annualized volatility: The standard deviation of returns scaled to one year. It describes variability, not merely losses.
  • Maximum drawdown: The largest peak-to-trough decline during the tested period.
  • Correlation: A measure from -1 to 1 describing how closely two return series moved together.
  • Return-to-volatility: Annualized return divided by annualized volatility. It is a simple risk-adjusted comparison, not proof of skill.
  • Newey–West t-statistic: A significance statistic whose standard error is adjusted for autocorrelation and changing variance in returns.
  • Five-factor alpha: Return left unexplained after controlling for the Fama–French market, size, value, profitability and investment factors. An insignificant alpha is not evidence of persistent outperformance.
  • In sample: Evaluated on history that influenced development of the rule. It is useful for rejecting incoherent mechanics but is not an independent forecast test.

Models, Deterministic Inference and Replay

  • Open-weight model: A model whose learned numerical weights can be downloaded and independently run, subject to its license.
  • Checkpoint or model revision: One exact release of a model. A repository name alone is insufficient because its files can change.
  • Qwen3.8-27B-FP8: The specific open-weight model used here: roughly 27 billion parameters represented with eight-bit floating-point weights for efficient inference.
  • H200: The NVIDIA data-center GPU profile used on both replay machines.
  • SGLang: The model-serving runtime used to execute the Qwen requests.
  • Deterministic inference: An execution mode designed so the same committed request and compute profile produce the same output bytes, even when requests are processed in batches.
  • Tokenizer: The exact software and vocabulary that convert text into the numerical tokens processed by the model.
  • Temperature: A sampling control. Temperature zero removes ordinary random sampling, although it is not sufficient by itself for byte reproducibility.
  • Seed: A fixed initial value used by pseudorandom operations. It must be bound with the rest of the runtime configuration.
  • Tensor parallelism: Splitting one model across multiple GPUs. This demonstration used tensor parallelism one, meaning one GPU served each model replica.
  • Radix cache: A serving optimization that reuses common prompt prefixes. It was disabled to keep the replay profile simple and controlled.
  • CUDA graph: A captured sequence of GPU operations reused for speed. Prefill and decode CUDA graphs were disabled in the strict profile.
  • Canonical request: One precisely serialized prompt and schema whose bytes are fixed before execution. Semantically equivalent wording is still a different request.
  • UTF-8 bytes: The actual encoded output compared by the replay test. Matching parsed scores is weaker than matching the complete response bytes.
  • Byte-identical: Every byte is in the same position on both machines. The 4,000 demonstrated replays met this standard.
  • SHA-256: A cryptographic hash function that turns any artifact into a short fixed-length digest. Changing even one byte changes the digest with overwhelming probability.
  • Content-addressed image: A container image identified by its cryptographic digest rather than a mutable label such as latest.
  • Manifest: A machine-readable list of the exact inputs, versions, rules and hashes admitted for one run.
  • Provenance or lineage: The recorded chain connecting source documents, model files, runtime, outputs and final index weights.
  • Replay receipt: A signed or published record showing which request was rerun and which output hashes the independent operator obtained.

PFTL, Flare and Onchain Delivery

  • PFTL: Post Fiat Ledger, the proposed network for registering index series, collecting replay receipts and finalizing canonical index epochs.
  • IPFS: A distributed content-addressed file system. A file is retrieved by a hash-derived identifier, so silent modification produces a different address.
  • TEE: Trusted execution environment, hardware intended to isolate code and data from the machine operator while producing evidence about what ran.
  • Attestation: A signed statement from trusted hardware or an attestation service about an execution environment and the code it loaded. It does not prove that the model’s judgment is economically correct.
  • Flare Compute Extension, or FCE: Flare infrastructure for admitting trusted code versions and verifying signed compute results.
  • Flare Data Connector, or FDC: Flare’s system for reaching consensus on specified external data claims.
  • Web2Json: An FDC workflow that extracts and attests defined JSON fields from a web source. It is suitable for narrow facts, not for proving the semantic truth of an entire model output.
  • Coston2: Flare’s public test network, used to test integrations without requiring production FLR.
  • Onchain gate: A smart contract that accepts an index epoch only when its required hashes and attestations match the registered policy.
  • ATP: Automated Token Portfolio, a portfolio methodology delivered through programmable tokenized-asset execution rather than a conventional pooled robo-adviser account.
  • Smart-contract vault: Onchain code that holds or controls assets under predefined rules and can rebalance toward published target weights.
  • Session key: A limited authorization allowing an automation system to perform specified actions without receiving unrestricted control of the owner’s wallet.
  • Tokenized share: A blockchain token connected through an issuer and custody structure to an underlying security or claim. The token is not automatically the registered share itself.
  • Beneficial claim: The holder’s economic entitlement through a legal and custody structure even when another entity is the registered owner of the underlying share.